Ghana has made progress cutting maternal deaths, but the promise of safe motherhood  remains unfulfilled. A recent statistical report finds Ghana’s maternal mortality ratio (MMR) at  roughly 300 deaths per 100,000 live births nationally [1] – about quadruple the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal of 70. Even this figure masks a stark rural–urban gap: by 2021 the rural  MMR was 374 while urban was 2331. In other words, a Ghanaian mother in the countryside is  60% more likely to die in childbirth than one in Accra. Nor is this gap evenly distributed. In the  Northern Region, maternal deaths have surged: from 69 in 2022 to 100 in 2023, lifting the  institutional MMR to 136.7– exceeding even the national target of 125. [2] 

    This tragedy is not due to bad luck or fate. Nearly all maternal deaths in Ghana – as  elsewhere in the world – are preventable. Global health experts note that 99% of maternal deaths occur in low-resource settings, largely from treatable complications (hemorrhage, hypertension,  infections) when care is delayed or insufficient [3]. Ghana’s own studies show the same pattern: a  2018 case investigation in rural Upper East Region found that maternal deaths were linked to  “lack of logistics, medical, and laboratory equipment” at clinics, plus weak prenatal care and  protocols. [4] In plain terms: women are dying in childbirth because the system is failing them. 

     Behind the numbers are mothers, sisters, and daughters whose lives were cut short. One  recent qualitative study in Ghana interviewed family members of women who died in childbirth.  Every participant described an overwhelmingly negative hospital experience. [5] A common refrain  was “no one gave me information” – hospitals communicated poorly or not at all as women bled  and struggled. This communication breakdown left relatives “limited understanding of the  patient’s clinical status”, compounding their grief. [5] Strikingly, these families overwhelmingly  felt the deaths were avoidable and unexpected. As one bereaved husband lamented, “Had we known what was happening, maybe we could have done something.” But even as survivors poured out their concerns, hospitals offered virtually no support. Only 10% of these families  received any counseling or psychosocial help after the death, even though 93% wished for it. [5] The result is an invisible yet profound suffering: a childless widow or an orphaned toddler with  unanswered questions and unrelieved trauma. 
     This suffering raises urgent ethical concerns. At its core, maternal mortality is a failure of  justice and equity. Every woman has a fundamental right to safe childbirth; to lose so many  mothers in the prime of life (often during their 20s and 30s) is a gross injustice. The deaths are  acutely biased by geography, poverty, and gender norms. Rural families, poorer households, and  marginalized communities bear the brunt. The Northern Region – one of the poorest, with erratic  rains and dirt roads – now reports the highest regional death rate.2 Health officials explicitly link  the spike to inadequate infrastructure and staff: “bad roads to health centers,” a shortage of  doctors and anesthetic machines, and chronic equipment stockouts.2 These are not mysterious  forces but policy failures. The ethical principle of distributive justice demands that resources  (clinics, personnel, ambulances) be allocated to those in greatest need – yet Ghana’s north is  starved of such basics. 
     Moreover, the maternal death narrative often includes grim “three delays” – decision to  seek care, travel to care, and receiving treatment– which mostly trace to social and systemic  barriers [4]. Many women cannot even decide to go without a husband’s permission. Even when  they decide, lack of transport (or money for it) means delays on bad roads. And when they reach  a clinic, critical medicines or trained staff may be missing, causing further delay in lifesaving  care. Each delay is an ethical lapse: delays in an emergency shouldn’t occur in a fair system.  When Ghanaian policymakers signed on to the Sustainable Development Goals, they pledged no mother should die giving life – yet their own health systems allow these delays daily. 
     Ghana’s story also highlights the tension between well-meaning policy and reality. The  2008 Free Maternal Care policy (under NHIS) was a landmark commitment: pregnant women  would receive antenatal visits, delivery, and cesarean care at no cost. In theory, this should have  slashed financial barriers. In practice, Ghanaian women still carry heavy bills. A 2024 study  found persistent out-of-pocket payments for supposedly free services. [6]  Why? Hospitals face  delayed NHIS reimbursements, incomplete drug kits, and stockouts. Desperate to keep running,  providers pass those costs back to women: extra charges for supplies, or even informal “under the-table” fees. One researcher warns that without fixing these structural issues, Ghana risks  missing its maternal health goals entirely. [6] Ethically, it is indefensible that poverty should determine whether a mother lives or dies. A free care policy that isn’t truly free betrays the  promise of universal health coverage and violates the principle of justice. 
     Beyond money and infrastructure lie deeper cultural and communication gaps.  Traditional practices and gender norms still influence decisions about where and when to deliver. Yet the healthcare response is often paternalistic and aloof. Families recounted feeling blamed or  ignored. One father reported nurses treating his wife’s pleas for help as mere “complaints.” This  echoes a broader pattern: healthcare workers in Ghana (as in many places) may lack training in  respectful maternity care. Ethically, respect for persons requires clear, compassionate  communication. As one ethics expert put it, a death in the family creates a “black box” of trauma  – unless the hospital guides relatives, families are left mistrustful and heartbroken. [5] Tragically, when mothers die, their families become the patients too, needing counseling and answers – needs currently unmet by Ghana’s system. Researchers stress that “strategies to improve  communication between healthcare providers and families are essential,” and formal support  services must be provided for those left behind. [5]

 

Root Causes: Where Ethics and Public Health Converge
 

     This crisis lies at the intersection of public health failures and ethical wrongs. Public health tells us what is happening; ethics tells us why it matters and what to do. The data expose inequities: regions like Upper East and Volta report MMRs in the high 300s (years higher than the national average, and teen and older mothers see even greater risks.1 Ethically, this staggered risk undermines the principle of "fair innings" – the idea that every person is entitled to a normal span of life. Culturally marginalized groups, like Northern Ghana’s ethnic minorities, are underrepresented in resource planning. The inverse care law holds: those who need care most (rural poor) get it least.
     The public health solution is multifaceted, but each proposed fix is laden with ethical imperative:

• Staffing and Training: Ghana’s regional health directorate noted a dearth of doctors and specialists in the North. [2] Ethical duty to provide equal access means the government must incentivize skilled providers to serve in remote districts (via hardship allowances, rural training tracks, or mandatory service). Continuous capacity-building for midwives and nurses is crucial, especially in obstetric emergency skills. These investments directly save lives and address the justice of fair resource distribution.
• Infrastructure and Logistics: That 2024 review cited poor roads and a lack of anesthesia machines as factors in the Northern spike.2 From a public health standpoint, a mother needs an ambulance on a passable road – an ethical obligation to safeguard life. Policymakers must invest in rural health posts, reliable electricity, blood banks, and transport networks so that complications can be treated before they become fatal.
• Healthcare Financing: To honor the promise of free care, the NHIS must be reformed. The system needs timely reimbursement and complete coverage (including drugs, equipment, and ambulances) so that facilities aren’t forced to charge patients extra.7 Transparency and accountability mechanisms (anti-corruption audits, provider reporting) should ensure funds reach the front line. Legally and ethically, eliminating informal fees is a matter of rights: no woman should trade her dignity or savings to survive childbirth.
• Quality of Care and Communication: Hospitals must adopt respectful maternity care as a standard. This means training providers in empathetic communication and establishing protocols for family updates during emergencies. Policy should mandate on-site counselors or social workers to support bereaved families. Ethically, this is about upholding respect for persons – treating patients and families with dignity even amidst tragedy. Research shows that when families understand what is happening, they can cope better (and hold systems accountable). [5]
• Community Engagement and Education: Ghana’s northern study (PREMAND) and others emphasize social factors like delayed decision-making and use of traditional medicine. [5] Public health programs must partner with community leaders, women’s groups, and even traditional birth attendants to promote timely care-seeking. Cultural competence training for health workers can bridge the divide. For instance, mobile health technologies or trained community health volunteers could ensure women know danger signs and how to get transport. Ethically, empowering women with information and voice
addresses the autonomy imbalance that often costs lives.
• Data and Accountability: Finally, Ghana must strengthen its vital statistics. Reliable data (as in the 2017 and 2021 census reports) illuminate hotspots.2 Continued surveillance, maternal death audits, and open reporting will ensure no case is hidden. This transparency is both a public health tool and an ethical pledge that every life lost will be honored by learning how to prevent the next death.

​

Recommendations

​

     Ghana’s maternal mortality problem is not a foregone fate but a remediable crisis. The health sector, civil society, and international partners must unite under a shared ethical mandate: to ensure that no woman dies giving life. Specific policy steps should include:

• Enact rural health incentives: scholarships and career pathways that require service in underserved areas; improved living conditions for rural doctors.
• Upgrade infrastructure: prioritize clinic electrification, emergency transport (ambulances, radios), and medical supply chains in high-risk districts.
• Fully implement the Free Maternal Care Law: eliminate all point-of-service fees, ensure NHIS covers all necessary supplies, and audit hospitals for compliance.
• Institute provider-patient communication standards: mandating that family conferences are held for obstetric emergencies, and that verbal autopsy reports are shared with relatives in culturally sensitive ways.
• Expand postnatal and bereavement services: integrate counseling and community support for women and families after childbirth complications or death.
• Engage men and communities in maternal health: programs to educate husbands and elders about emergency obstetric care and women’s rights. Each recommendation carries not just technical merit but moral weight. Ghana’s leaders have repeatedly affirmed a commitment to Universal Health Coverage (now six years away by the SDG timeline), yet maternal health lags dangerously behind.2 To ignore these maternal deaths is to tolerate systemic disrespect for women’s lives. As one observer noted, Ghana continues losing “a number of women” even as the numbers go down, a sobering reminder that progress must accelerate. [7]

 

     Our society measures its progress by how it cares for the most vulnerable. In Ghana, the most vulnerable include pregnant women in remote villages – women who wake up in pain and discover there’s no doctor or ambulance available. An editorial in The Lancet memorably said “maternal deaths are often the 'tip of an iceberg, '” implying countless suffering beneath the surface. [7] Ghana’s leaders and the global health community must ensure that each iceberg is melted – through equity-driven policies, respectful care, and genuine political will.

     The death of one mother is a national tragedy; the death of many mothers is a national emergency. It is both a moral imperative and a public health necessity that Ghana redoubles its effort now, ensuring that the next generation of mothers gives birth to life without losing their own.